einstein (São Paulo). 01/Oct/2010;8(4 Pt 1):456-60.

Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy

Hideki Kanashiro, Roberto Iglesias Lopes, Fernando Akira Saito, Anuar Ibrahim Mitre, Francisco Tibor Denes, José Luis Chambô, Renato Falci Jr, Affonso Celso Piovesan, Elias David Neto, William Carlos Nahas

DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082010AO1671

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy.

Methods:

A non-randomized prospective analysis was conducted of living donor kidney transplantations (118 open donor nephrectomies; 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies) between January 2005 and December 2007 in the Kidney Transplantation Unit of Hospital das Clínicas of Faculdade de Medicina of the Universidade de São Paulo.

Results:

Mean donor operative time, mean donor hospital stay, mean postoperative creatinine values, and rates of complications and graft survival were similar for both groups. A significant statistical difference in warm ischemia time was observed between the open donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy groups (p < 0.001). There was only one conversion in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure for a donor nephrectomy, comparable to an open procedure with similar results despite a longer warm ischemia time.

Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy

Comments