einstein (São Paulo). 01/Jun/2015;13(2):221-5.

Assessment of adherence to the guidelines for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy

Monique Sedlmaier França, Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón Junior, Yuri Philippe Pimentel Vieira Antunes, Bernard Lobato Prado, Carlos del Cistia Donnarumma, Taciana Sousa Mutão, Heloisa Veasey Rodrigues, Auro del Giglio

DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3097

ABSTRACT
Objective:
To assess adherence of the prescribing physicians in a private cancer care center to the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetic prophylaxis, in the first cycle of antineoplastic chemotherapy.
Methods:
A total of 139 chemotherapy regimens, of 105 patients, were evaluated retrospectively from 2011 to 2013.
Results:
We observed 78% of non-adherence to the guideline rate. The main disagreements with the directive were the prescription of higher doses of dexamethasone and excessive use of 5-HT3 antagonist for low risk emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. On univariate analysis, hematological malignancies (p=0.005), the use of two or more chemotherapy (p=0.05) and high emetogenic risk regimes (p=0.012) were factors statistically associated with greater adherence to guidelines. Treatment based on paclitaxel was the only significant risk factor for non-adherence (p=0.02). By multivariate analysis, the chemotherapy of high emetogenic risk most correlated with adherence to guideline (p=0.05).
Conclusion:
We concluded that the adherence to guidelines is greater if the chemotherapy regime has high emetogenic risk. Educational efforts should focus more intensely on the management of chemotherapy regimens with low and moderate emetogenic potential. Perhaps the development of a computer generated reminder may improve the adherence to guidelines.

Assessment of adherence to the guidelines for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy

Comments