Highlights Radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol injection are neoadjuvant hepatocellular carcinoma treatment methods. Radiofrequency ablation achieves a higher complete response rate (96.3% versus 60.0%, p=0.001). Total cost analyses showed radiofrequency ablation as a more expensive method (p<0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$ -2674.59 with an advantage for radiofrequency ablation. Incremental effectiveness (34.2%) was in favor of radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. ABSTRACT Objective: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation compared with percutaneous ethanol injection in patients […]

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the operative time, length of hospitalization and cost, as well as the bleeding and pain observed during the postoperative period, of thyroidectomy procedures using vessel sealing, harmonic scalpel or the conventional technique. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of thyroidectomies performed between 2007 and 2010 using either the conventional technique or minimally invasive techniques involving vessel sealing or a harmonic scalpel. Gender, age, primary diagnosis and procedure type were analyzed. The outcomes analyzed included the length of the procedure, length […]