The journal einstein (São Paulo) – e-ISSN 2317-6385 is dedicated to dissemination of high-quality scientific content that advances our understanding of human disease with the goal of improving prevention, care, diagnostics and treatment of patients globally.
The author of the letter aims to make explicit, through the evidence represented by the volume of publications, that religious beliefs can be “bad for your health.” We cannot refute such a statement. However, accepting it does not imply refusing the possibility that religion and religiosity act as protective factors. Religion, like other complex social practices, generally does not respect the dichotomies established by the reductions in our masterful ways of thinking.
AkermanM, MendesR, CostaSL, GuerraHL, SilvaRA, SacardoDP, FernandezJCA. Reply to: Religion and health: not always good. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020;18:eCE6170. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020CE6170
Akerman,Marco; Mendes,Rosilda; Costa,Samira Lima da; Guerra,Henrique Leonardo; Silva,Rafael Afonso da; Sacardo,Daniele Pompei; Fernandez,Juan Carlos Aneiros. Reply to: Religion and health: not always good. Einstein (Sao Paulo)., v. 18, eCE6170, Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020CE6170
Akerman,M., Mendes,R., Costa,S.L. , Guerra,H.L., Silva,R.A. , Sacardo,D.P., & Fernandez,J.C.A. (2020). Reply to: Religion and health: not always good. Einstein (Sao Paulo).,18, eCE6170. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020CE6170
Akerman,Marco and Mendes,Rosilda and Costa,Samira Lima da and Guerra,Henrique Leonardo and Silva,Rafael Afonso da and Sacardo,Daniele Pompei and Fernandez,Juan Carlos Aneiros. Reply to: Religion and health: not always good. Einstein (Sao Paulo). [online]. 2020, vol. 18, [cited 2025-09-06], eCE6170. Available from: <https://journal.einstein.br/article/reply-to-religion-and-health-not-always-good/>. ISSN 1679-4508. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020CE6170
Figure 5
Risk of bias assessment of non-RCTs using the ROBINS-I tool
Non-RCT, nonrandomized controlled trial; ROBINS-I, Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions