einstein (São Paulo). 10/set/2024;22:eED1194.
The challenge of reviewers scarcity in academic journals: payment as a viable solution
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024ED1194
To review or not to review?
For the participants, factors that most affected their decision on accepting to review a paper was the subject of the paper followed by time I have available for reviewing a paper, prestige of the journal, feeling of scientific/social responsibility, relationship with the associate editor and, clear advantage for the career. Meanwhile, factors that count on their decisions the most for rejecting a review were time I have available for reviewing a paper, followed by subject of the paper, [lack of] prestige of the journal, feeling of scientific/social responsibility, clear advantage for the career and, relationship with the associate editor ().
[…]
The challenge of reviewers scarcity in academic journals: payment as a viable solution
307
